 |
                        |
|
This is a demonstration to show how different fuel treatments react with water in your fuel and also how well they burn in your vehicle. First, we have added equal parts of gasoline and fuel treatment into the beaker at the left. Then we have taken water, colored with green food coloring and added it to this mixture. After mixing the beaker, you can see how well each fuel additive mixes with the fuel and water to eliminate it from your system. Second, we have taken a small amount of each fuel additive and put it into a metal spoon. We then have used a small torch to ignite the fuel treatment. In each case we speak of the flash point, which tells you how readily it ignites, indicating the good or bad primary cleaning agents. Low flash point is desired. You can also see how well the fuel treatment burns and more importantly, what is left in your combustion chamber when the burn is complete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the beaker of QMI Fuel Treatment, gasoline and colored water, you can see that the water has bonded completely with the fuel treatment, enabling it to be burnt with efficiency in the combustion chamber. In the spoon burn test, the QMI Fuel Treatment has a low flash point, which is good, has burnt clean, leaving a secondary lubrication and cleaning agents to dissolve existing carbon, resulting in a clean combustion for less emissions, longer fuel pump, injector, and cylinder life and better fuel economy. buy QMI now |
In the beaker of Heet (Gasoline Antifreeze & Water Remover), gasoline and colored water, you can see that the Heet did absorb the water, but it then settled immediately to the bottom of the beaker. This leaves a heavy concentration of methanol and water in the bottom of the fuel tank, where your fuel pump intake lies, which increases wear on fuel pump, injectors and cylinders. In the spoon burn test, the Heet has a low flash point, burns very clean, but leaves absolutely no lubrication or secondary cleaning agents. |
|
|
|
|
In the beaker of Chemtool Injector Cleaner, gasoline and colored water, you can see that the Chemtool did not absorb the water, allowing it to settle immediately to the bottom of the beaker. In the spoon burn test, the Chemtool has a low flash point, but burns very dirty, sooty and dry, leaving absolutely no lubrication or secondary cleaning agents. |
In the beaker of STP Water Remover, gasoline and colored water, you can see that the STP did not absorb the water, allowing it to settle immediately to the bottom of the beaker. In the spoon burn test, the STP has a medium flash point, burns very dirty and sooty, leaving a sticky residue with no lubrication or secondary cleaning agents. |
|
|
|
|
In the beaker of QMI Fuel Treatment, gasoline and colored water, you can see that the water has bonded completely with the fuel treatment, enabling it to be burnt with efficiency in the combustion chamber. In the spoon burn test, the QMI Fuel Treatment has a low flash point, which is good, has burnt clean, leaving a secondary lubrication and cleaning agents to dissolve existing carbon, resulting in a clean combustion for less emissions, longer fuel pump, injector, and cylinder life and better fuel economy. buy QMI now |
In the beaker of Lucas, gasoline and colored water, you can see that the Lucas did not absorb the water, allowing it to settle immediately to the bottom of the beaker. Lucas also did not readily mix with the fuel, but stayed in the bottom of the beaker, indicating extremely poor mixing properties. In the spoon burn test, the Lucas has a very high flash point (not good, nearly comes to a boil before it will flash), burns extremely dirty and sooty, with no lubrication or secondary cleaning agents. |
|
|
|
|
In the beaker of Sea Foam, gasoline and colored water, you can see that the Sea Foam did not absorb the water, allowing it to settle immediately to the bottom of the beaker. In the spoon burn test, the Sea Foam has a medium flash point, burns extremely dirty and sooty, with no lubrication or secondary cleaning agents. |
|
