|

|
How Does QMI
Compare with the Competition? |
|
|
 |
|
|
QMI
Beats the Competition |
|
Hands Down! |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QMI |
Lucas |
Slick 50 Professional |
Dura-Lube |
Prolong |
 |
| |
|
Add to each oil change |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
 |
|
Lasts how many miles |
50,000 |
3,000 |
12,000 |
3,000 |
3,000 |
|
 |
|
*Sequence III E Test |
Reduced wear 88% |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
 |
|
Contains chlorine compounds |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
 |
|
May cause corrosion |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
 |
|
Contains PTFE |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
 |
|
Price for each treatment |
$19.95 |
$7.95 |
$14.95 |
$14.95 |
$22.95 |
|
 |
|
**Cost for 50,000 miles |
$19.95 |
$132.50 |
$62.29 |
$249.83 |
$382.50 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Sequence
IIIE Test, a test showing wear reduction, was performed by
Southwest Research Institute. This test revealed that QMI Engine
Treatment gives greater protection than any other brand of engine
treatment. |
|
|
**Based on 3,000 mile oil
changes |
|
|
 |
|
QMI Reduces Wear
on All Engines, Transmissions and Rear-Ends by as much as 40 to 90%!!
|
| |
|
MAN B&W 7500HP, ship engine |
79% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
Sequence IIIE Test, gas engine |
88% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
Detroit 60 Series |
65% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
International 9500 |
40% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
CAT 777B |
56% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
N-14 Cummins |
56% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
Cummins Delivery Van |
42% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
5.9 Cummins Dodge Pick-Up |
41% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
CAT 3208 De-limber |
48% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
CAT 3406B Log Truck |
57% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
John Deere Tractor |
48% Less Wear |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
Cummins LTA-10, Diesel |
20 HP increase Dyno Test |
| |
|
|
United Parcel, Gas |
5 HP increase Dyno Test |
| |
|
|
Bobby Unser 350CI, Gas |
7 HP increase Dyno Test |
| |
|
|
Sears Testing Lab, Gas |
5 HP increase Dyno Test |
| |
|
|
Average Fuel Economy Increase |
|
2-4 MPG in cars |
|
1-3 MPG in all
pickup trucks |
|
0.3 to 0.7 MPG
in Over-The-Road trucks |
| |
|
| |
|
| All tests
performed independently by Labs and Testing Facilities. |
| |
|
| |
|
return to top |
| |
| |
 |
|
 |