|

|
What other
manufacturers DON'T tell you about their engine treatments. |
| Chlorine
Additives Can Cause Corrosion |
| |
Consumers
frequently encounter "engine treatment" products containing
chlorinated additives, often demonstrated with oil-less engines or
bench tests such as bearing testers. While these demonstrations
attract attention, they do not represent "real world" engine operating
conditions where chlorine's long term corrosive attack can outweigh
any short-term benefits.
Chlorinated additives belong to the "chemically active extreme
pressure" additives category along with sulfur, phosphorus, lead and
zinc, for applications where boundary lubrication prevails. Boundary
lubrication occurs when high load between rubbing surfaces forces out
oil, leaving only a thin residual for lubrication. Under high load
conditions, extreme pressure additives in the residual film chemically
react with the metal surfaces to form a surface coating.
|
| Quick
reactivity
|
| Chlorinated
additives react quickly with metal surfaces due to high electron
negativity. Therefore, chlorinated additives are sometimes used in
industrial cutting fluids designed to meet the extreme pressure
requirement of metal machining. Metal machining involves a "one pass"
metal shearing operation in an open system with constant flushing,
conditions not conducive to corrosive attack. |
| |
| Hydrochloric
acid corrosion
|
| By contrast,
the internal combustion engine involves a closed system with
conditions described by Mr. Maurice LePera, who served as Associate
Director for Fuels and Lubricants at the U.S. Army's Tank-Automotive
Research Development and Engineering Center, in the August, 1998,
"Lubes-n-Greases" article "Chlorine & Engine Oils: A Good Mix?":
|
|
"Chlorinated
additives are not used in modern, fully formulated automotive engine
oils. The environment within an internal combustion engine consists of
high temperatures, combustion and blow-by gasses, moisture, acid and
oxidation precursors, wear debris, unburned fuel, etc. The combination
of these ingredients when combined with the catalytic effects of
metallic surfaces and trace soluble metals such as copper will cause
the chlorine to hydrolyze, forming hydrochloric acid and other
associated reaction products. Once generated, these acidic reaction
products can cause serious internal engine corrosion problems,
especially on ferrous and aluminum alloys." |
| |
| Specs
prohibit chlorine
|
| Although some
of the chlorine additives marketed for engine crankcase application
may contain corrosion inhibitors, these are a short-term fix that
cannot provide long-term protection. Since the corrosion process is
not visible to the vehicle operator, it can continue until the
cumulative effects induce engine malfunction and failures. Again,
quoting Mr. LePera: |
|
"Corrosion
within an engine can be a 'silent killer'."
|
| These concerns
are supported by military lubricating oil specification and commercial
specifications prohibiting use of chlorinated additives. |
| |
| Engine
components
|
| Further, Mr.
Cliff Gottlob of Gottlob Research and Engineering reports:
|
|
"This
[by-product of chlorine in engines] is a very corrosive product that
is not only detrimental to such components as bearings, pistons and
any metal parts, but also the environment. ... The devastating effect
of chlorine on such items as rubber, neoprene, cork and compositions
which are basic ingredients used in seals, gaskets, etc., is extremely
bad." |
| |
| Labels dodge
issue
|
| Unfortunately,
many chlorine additive container labels do not state, "Contains
chlorine". Technically, chlorine in its pure form is a gas, so these
products dodge the issue by using chlorinated hydrocarbons,
paraffin's, solvents, etc. If the additive container label states,
"Contains no PTFE, graphite, molybdenum disulfide or solids", the
product may likely contain chlorinated additives. |
| |
| Trick
demonstrations
|
| Due to
chlorine's quick reactivity, promotional demonstrations such as
oil-less engine operation and bearing testers prove attractive to the
unwary consumer. However, note comments from syndicated newspaper
column "Drive It Forever" by leading automotive expert Mr. Bob
Sikorsky, member of the SAE and STLE, nationally syndicated automotive
columnist and author, and recognized consumer advocate: |
|
"Sadly, a number
of these [chlorinated additive] infomercials use trickery and
deception to convince the public to buy the product. ... The
demonstrations shown in these infomercials are meaningless, and have
nothing to do with what actually happens inside an engine during
operation. ... The downside, which of course is never mentioned, is
that it's extremely corrosive.
"Because they are so corrosive, the oil industry stopped using
chlorine compounds as engine-oil additives more than 40 years ago.
You, too, should reject any product that contains chlorinated
hydrocarbons. ... I personally sent samples of both [Dura-Lube and
Prolong] products to a respected lab for analysis of chlorine content.
Dura-Lube tested at 6.8 percent chlorine, while Prolong came in,
incredibly, at just under 30 percent. ...[From another column.]
Motor-up was shown to contain 17.9 percent chlorine.
"Choosing the right product could mean the difference between real
50,000-mile engine wear protection, and an engine hosting unproven
possibly dangerous formulations. ... Only ASTM- and SAE-approved
engine tests are meaningful, and neither of these companies [Dura-Lube
and Prolong] has proven its product under these industry-recognized
testing procedures."
|
| |
| Longevity
|
| An October,
1998, "Consumer Report" article, "Prolong additive: Don't try this at
home," addressed the infomercial demonstration issue: |
|
"The bond is
supposed to last even when the oil is drained. In the [Prolong]
infomercial, Unser and others drive along a racetrack in the Mojave
Desert without oil or oil drain plugs. The same ad, broadcast
nationally, pictures a woman who, thanks to Prolong, supposedly drove
from Santa Barbara to Los Angeles without oil. (The reason she stopped
after 4 hours, 40 minutes, and 7 seconds? She was hungry.)
"We didn't test the other claims, but we did see whether Prolong would
protect an engine after the oil was drained.
"We installed a factory-rebuilt GM 4.3-liter V6 engine into each of
two Chevrolet Caprices. We broke them in with Pennzoil motor oil, and
added Prolong to one of them. Prolong claims to work immediately. We
drove no more than 100 miles, then drained the oil and started driving
again. After only 13 minutes and five miles, both engines failed
simultaneously."
|
| |
| The QMI
difference
|
By contrast,
QMI Engine Treatment is a friction surface treatment with PTFE, which
is chemically inert and therefore friendly to all engine components.
QMI Engine Treatment was tested by Southwest Research Institute
utilizing ASTM's Sequence III E,
producing 88% average wear reduction in a V6 Buick engine and passing
the full battery of engine safety tests.
QMI has also proven effective in the demanding industrial market,
which typically forbids the use of chlorinated additives in closed
lubrication systems.
|
Other products
know to contain chlorine:
Dura-Lube, Energy Release, MT-10, Metal Lube, Militec-1, Motor Up,
Prolong, Skorpion, IXL.
|
|
return to top |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
 |
|
 |